Market Gains in Pettis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 188
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pettis County, Missouri totaled $1,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wayne A Minor | La Monte, MO 65337 | $5,480 |
82 | Earl T Crawford Trust | La Monte, MO 65337 | $5,239 |
83 | Harrison Brothers | La Monte, MO 65337 | $5,210 |
84 | Carrol Dean Guier Revocable Trust | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $5,100 |
85 | Bruce Dwayne Morton | Knob Noster, MO 65336 | $5,038 |
86 | Everett L Blackburn | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $5,014 |
87 | Keith Dale Thompson | La Monte, MO 65337 | $4,846 |
88 | Michael Elwin Killion | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $4,810 |
89 | Frank Daniel Higgins | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $4,795 |
90 | Gene Dale Thompson | La Monte, MO 65337 | $4,494 |
91 | Kathryn Faye Dove | Green Ridge, MO 65332 | $4,362 |
92 | Frank D Beard | La Monte, MO 65337 | $4,314 |
93 | Ahlemeyer Family Trust | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $4,104 |
94 | Kenneth Francis Schuber | Hughesville, MO 65334 | $4,095 |
95 | Selken Farms | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $4,087 |
96 | Roger K Cordes | Ionia, MO 65335 | $4,071 |
97 | Larry Dean Cordes | Otterville, MO 65348 | $3,933 |
98 | Elmer Lentz Trust | La Monte, MO 65337 | $3,826 |
99 | Rose Mary Mcmullin | La Monte, MO 65337 | $3,813 |
100 | William Clay Mc Clure | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $3,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”