Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Phelps County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 394
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Phelps County, Missouri totaled $1,660,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Brian C Dean | Rolla, MO 65401 | $6,050 |
62 | Kimberly M Martin | Beulah, MO 65436 | $6,009 |
63 | Jonathan Michael Wells | Rolla, MO 65401 | $5,940 |
64 | Loyd Edgar | Edgar Springs, MO 65462 | $5,885 |
65 | Larry W Lorts | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,830 |
66 | Philip E Branstetter | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,720 |
67 | Scott Gahr | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,610 |
68 | Carl Romine | Newburg, MO 65550 | $5,500 |
69 | Samuel J Auxier | Rolla, MO 65401 | $5,445 |
70 | David F Campbell | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,445 |
71 | Raymond Schwartze | Meta, MO 65058 | $5,390 |
72 | Stephen P Sullivan | Salem, MO 65560 | $5,390 |
73 | Lucas Garage | Newburg, MO 65550 | $5,335 |
74 | Duncan Real Estate Inc | Rolla, MO 65401 | $5,280 |
75 | Joshua Thomas Hancock | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,280 |
76 | Jonathan A Finch | Rolla, MO 65401 | $5,225 |
77 | Gary Henry Edgar | Edgar Springs, MO 65462 | $5,115 |
78 | Scott Bruce Selberg | Lake Spring, MO 65532 | $5,115 |
79 | Carl R Smith | Newburg, MO 65550 | $5,115 |
80 | Lane Of Hooves & Paws LLC | Saint James, MO 65559 | $5,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”