Direct Payment Program in Phelps County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 144
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Phelps County, Missouri totaled $783,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Penny Lou Beaner | Bland, MO 65014 | $3,037 |
62 | Carolyn Tilford | Saint James, MO 65559 | $2,798 |
63 | Harold L Spurgeon | Saint James, MO 65559 | $2,775 |
64 | Ralph Allen | Vichy, MO 65580 | $2,750 |
65 | John Noble | Springfield, MO 65804 | $2,722 |
66 | Burnell C Bahr | Cook Station, MO 65449 | $2,683 |
67 | Leon Kreisler | Salem, MO 65560 | $2,603 |
68 | James G Ashby | Saint James, MO 65559 | $2,588 |
69 | Mary L Gonzales | Rolla, MO 65402 | $2,569 |
70 | Susan Dubuisson | Opelousas, LA 70570 | $2,378 |
71 | Garold Gately | Newburg, MO 65550 | $2,342 |
72 | Douglas W Melton | Edgar Springs, MO 65462 | $2,327 |
73 | Fairel Garrett | Newburg, MO 65550 | $2,319 |
74 | James W Garner | Edgar Springs, MO 65462 | $2,256 |
75 | Mathis Farms LLC | Newburg, MO 65550 | $2,088 |
76 | John E Gibson | Saint James, MO 65559 | $1,886 |
77 | Esther Parry | Saint James, MO 65559 | $1,825 |
78 | Sturgeon Farm LLC | Newburg, MO 65550 | $1,818 |
79 | John C Eckert | Saint Louis, MO 63122 | $1,802 |
80 | Dorlene Marie Shults | Salem, MO 65560 | $1,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”