Loan Deficiency in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,118
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $17,038,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cheonda Farms, Inc. | Paynesville, MO 63336 | $340,103 |
2 | Pike Grain Co Inc | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $326,071 |
3 | Jimmie Lee Adams | Frankford, MO 63441 | $291,092 |
4 | Thomas Gregory & Sons | Eolia, MO 63344 | $290,115 |
5 | Young Enterprises Inc | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $215,694 |
6 | Jimmie E Reading Rev Trust | Curryville, MO 63339 | $208,869 |
7 | John E Scherder | Frankford, MO 63441 | $203,906 |
8 | Troy Lee Blackwell | Frankford, MO 63441 | $183,070 |
9 | Frank D Omohundro | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $171,790 |
10 | Heim Bros Farms Inc | Middletown, MO 63359 | $160,643 |
11 | Lewis Swine Enterprise | Curryville, MO 63339 | $151,925 |
12 | John Henry Waddell Rev Liv Trust | Curryville, MO 63339 | $144,980 |
13 | Leverenz Brothers LLC | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $143,903 |
14 | Clifford Mahar | Curryville, MO 63339 | $140,714 |
15 | Wells Liv Rev Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $139,530 |
16 | Robert B Burkemper | Annada, MO 63330 | $137,831 |
17 | Frank Robert Omohundro | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $137,345 |
18 | Daniel Joseph Graver | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $129,990 |
19 | Double Ss Farms | Frankford, MO 63441 | $125,089 |
20 | A&l Adam Family Lllp | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $124,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>