Loan Deficiency in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,118
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $17,038,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel Eugene Hubert | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $123,023 |
22 | Beauchamp Farms Inc | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $122,506 |
23 | Alvin Franklin Adams Jr | Eolia, MO 63344 | $120,492 |
24 | James Edward Hubert | Curryville, MO 63339 | $114,986 |
25 | Don Leslie Shaw | Curryville, MO 63339 | $111,309 |
26 | Mark Eugene Franz | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $110,831 |
27 | Tepen Brothers Inc | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $110,370 |
28 | Rosie Lee Adams | Eolia, MO 63344 | $106,651 |
29 | Eugene F Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $105,897 |
30 | H Geoffrey Sterne | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $103,555 |
31 | Nolan Miller | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $102,193 |
32 | Backer Brothers | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $100,585 |
33 | Paul J & Linda K Scherder Rev Liv Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $100,472 |
34 | Robert D And Sandra S Niemeyer Re | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $97,259 |
35 | Scott Burroughs | Frankford, MO 63441 | $96,989 |
36 | Charles L Chapuis | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $96,094 |
37 | Robert Eugene Scherder | Middletown, MO 63359 | $95,320 |
38 | Bruce Rodhouse | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $95,143 |
39 | Triple R Farms LLC | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $94,493 |
40 | Welch Long Farms Inc | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $94,341 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”