Market Gains in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 89
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $1,068,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Lowell Harness | Middletown, MO 63359 | $2,043 |
62 | Wyble Land And Cattle Co LLC | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $2,020 |
63 | William H Harness | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,941 |
64 | Tony Twellman | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,761 |
65 | Young Enterprises Inc | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $1,748 |
66 | Fred Edward Niemeyer | Curryville, MO 63339 | $1,658 |
67 | Charles L Chapuis | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $1,654 |
68 | Timothy Martin Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,610 |
69 | Chad Dion Dempsey | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $1,470 |
70 | Alan Bryson Dempsey | Middletown, MO 63359 | $1,470 |
71 | William Alfred Lovelace | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $1,454 |
72 | Steven Joseph Niemeyer | Frankford, MO 63441 | $1,409 |
73 | Dave Mc Collum | Curryville, MO 63339 | $1,398 |
74 | Dennis Dale Shramek | Williamsburg, MO 63388 | $1,348 |
75 | Leroy Welch | Eolia, MO 63344 | $1,146 |
76 | James Edward Hubert | Curryville, MO 63339 | $1,080 |
77 | Daniel Eugene Hubert | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,080 |
78 | John Richard Allen | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $1,078 |
79 | Richard Bernard Dick Grote | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $993 |
80 | J D Sorrell | Frankford, MO 63441 | $891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”