Total Commodity Programs in Pike County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 741
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $3,985,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Benjamin Thomas Ledford | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $18,104 |
62 | Beauchamp Farms Inc | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $17,445 |
63 | Gentry Family Limited Partnership | Curryville, MO 63339 | $16,837 |
64 | Jerome Korte | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $15,626 |
65 | Charles L Chapuis | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $15,526 |
66 | Wilson & Turpin Farms LLC | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $15,412 |
67 | Braungardt Ag Farms LLC | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $15,304 |
68 | Robert Glen Gregory | Curryville, MO 63339 | $15,113 |
69 | James Lee Allen | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $14,830 |
70 | Harold L Mick Mehler | Silex, MO 63377 | $14,529 |
71 | Michael C Luebrecht | Middletown, MO 63359 | $14,517 |
72 | Gerald O Merz | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $14,496 |
73 | Gary Purk | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $14,361 |
74 | R Brock Meyer | Curryville, MO 63339 | $14,166 |
75 | Dale Schaffer | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $13,619 |
76 | Karl F Dewey III | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $13,565 |
77 | H Geoffrey Sterne | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $13,550 |
78 | Gary Raney | Frankford, MO 63441 | $13,273 |
79 | Obax Farms LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $12,978 |
80 | Michael J Martin | Curryville, MO 63339 | $12,704 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”