Loan Deficiency in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,118
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $17,038,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Tom Jaeger Jr | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $36,983 |
122 | John Richard Allen | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $36,694 |
123 | Darrell Grote | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $36,469 |
124 | Chapuis Family Trust | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $36,395 |
125 | Paul Kenneth Brown | Middletown, MO 63359 | $36,187 |
126 | Claude E Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $36,180 |
127 | Helen D Crane | Saint Louis, MO 63124 | $36,157 |
128 | Philip Brown | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $35,344 |
129 | Donald A Burkemper | Clarksville, MO 63336 | $35,298 |
130 | Harry H Robert Grote | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $35,183 |
131 | Sachs Investments Lp | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $34,949 |
132 | Monte George Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $34,517 |
133 | Bobby L Dempsey | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $34,412 |
134 | Chris Wade Niemeyer | Curryville, MO 63339 | $34,404 |
135 | James P Heitman | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $34,300 |
136 | G Leon Knock | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $34,005 |
137 | Steven Jerald Illy | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $32,874 |
138 | Hall Bros | Troy, MO 63379 | $32,490 |
139 | Reuther Farms | Eolia, MO 63344 | $31,340 |
140 | F William Human Jr Rev Trust | Clayton, MO 63105 | $31,277 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”