Conservation Reserve Program in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 655

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $21,993,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
41Emily SmithLouisiana, MO 63353$118,044
42Tom R WallaceLouisiana, MO 63353$113,337
43Harold Leo Mc BrideVandalia, MO 63382$112,603
44William R And Sally A Bouyea Joint Rev Liv TrustHannibal, MO 63401$110,900
45Linda I BeeBowling Green, MO 63334$107,647
46Roy F CoxBowling Green, MO 63334$107,517
47Roger J Mercer Non-exempt Marital Irrev TrustRochelle, IL 61068$107,094
48Sachs Investments LpWentzville, MO 63385$106,789
49Robert L HagerBowling Green, MO 63334$102,380
50Strowold Farms LLCBowling Green, MO 63334$98,750
51Jan C SchillingerPacific, MO 63069$98,382
52John And Patricia Ackerman Joint Liv Rev TrustSaint Louis, MO 63131$95,682
53Amy G Henry Rev TrustSaint Peters, MO 63376$95,448
54Bernard L HooverBallwin, MO 63021$95,160
55Leon And Fern Ennis Family TrustJefferson City, MO 65109$94,444
56William A OrfNew Hartford, MO 63359$93,966
57Izelle L Burns Rev Liv TrustBowling Green, MO 63334$90,015
58Willard O Magee TrustEolia, MO 63344$88,938
59Frank Robert OmohundroClarksville, MO 63336$88,891
60Steven J LangWeldon Spring, MO 63304$85,486

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag