Market Gains in Pike County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 89
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Pike County, Missouri totaled $1,068,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Steven Ledford | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $5,133 |
42 | Leon Holcumbrink | Rogersville, MO 65742 | $5,036 |
43 | Donald Clare Gibson | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $4,871 |
44 | Mcdannold Farm Inc | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $4,490 |
45 | Marcine Julius Niemeyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $4,173 |
46 | Edward Eugene Lewis | Curryville, MO 63339 | $3,952 |
47 | Elaine R Deters Rev Liv Trust | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $3,630 |
48 | Wayne William Korte | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $3,429 |
49 | Alvin Franklin Adams Jr | Eolia, MO 63344 | $3,296 |
50 | Thomas B Dempsey | New Hartford, MO 63359 | $3,267 |
51 | James W Hallows | Curryville, MO 63339 | $2,940 |
52 | Mark Tophinke | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $2,776 |
53 | Maurice L Illy | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $2,712 |
54 | Shannon Mayo Culwell Jr | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,570 |
55 | David Vincent Gibson | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,526 |
56 | Troy Lee Blackwell | Frankford, MO 63441 | $2,465 |
57 | James C Hearn | Curryville, MO 63339 | $2,335 |
58 | Arthur E Meyer | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $2,190 |
59 | Gerald Wright Todd Jr | Eolia, MO 63344 | $2,169 |
60 | Andrew Eugene Burkemper | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $2,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”