Conservation Reserve Program in Putnam County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 239
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Putnam County, Missouri totaled $1,886,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Taylor Quiring | Windom, MN 56101 | $50,000 |
2 | Karen Tisue-karen K Tisue Revocable Trust | Fort Myers, FL 33913 | $49,807 |
3 | , | $47,914 | |
4 | , | $47,888 | |
5 | Godfrey Resources Inc | Unionville, MO 63565 | $44,402 |
6 | Wayne Allen Wright | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $43,245 |
7 | Mary Ellen Wright | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $43,245 |
8 | Billy Brassfield | Arcadia, CA 91006 | $31,965 |
9 | Charles L Oreilly | Powersville, MO 64672 | $30,515 |
10 | Pieper Family Partnership Lp | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $30,420 |
11 | , | $29,743 | |
12 | Lavenia S Davis Revocable Trust Davis | Solon, IA 52333 | $29,305 |
13 | Evelyn Morgan | Unionville, MO 63565 | $27,885 |
14 | Double Deuce Ranch LLC | Powersville, MO 64672 | $27,452 |
15 | Steinert Farms LLC | Chandler, OK 74834 | $27,195 |
16 | Denise L Ballanger | Cincinnati, IA 52549 | $26,793 |
17 | Trimble Family Irrevocable Trust | Unionville, MO 63565 | $26,319 |
18 | Dls Holdings, LLC | Waverly, IA 50677 | $25,858 |
19 | Cecil D Cox | Mary Esther, FL 32569 | $25,119 |
20 | James L Godfrey | Powersville, MO 64672 | $23,541 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>