Counter Cyclical Program in Putnam County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 375
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Putnam County, Missouri totaled $1,152,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | David E Hines | Seymour, IA 52590 | $6,929 |
42 | Brent Minear | Livonia, MO 63551 | $6,745 |
43 | M Herschel Cooley Revocable Trust | Unionville, MO 63565 | $6,715 |
44 | James M Davis | Lady Lake, FL 32159 | $6,692 |
45 | William C Bruce Jr | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $6,680 |
46 | Wm C Bruce | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $6,680 |
47 | Barry Polson | Livonia, MO 63551 | $6,386 |
48 | Hurley Farms | Livonia, MO 63551 | $6,306 |
49 | W Conrad Eurom | Powersville, MO 64672 | $6,257 |
50 | Steve Elliott Peterson | Newtown, MO 64667 | $6,179 |
51 | Gracie Ann Wyer-wyer Rev Trust | Parnell, MO 64475 | $6,173 |
52 | Marvin D Wyer | Parnell, MO 64475 | $6,173 |
53 | Joel Childers | Unionville, MO 63565 | $6,153 |
54 | Greg Shipley | Unionville, MO 63565 | $6,102 |
55 | Danny Valentine | Lucerne, MO 64655 | $6,049 |
56 | Fern Valentine | Powersville, MO 64672 | $5,470 |
57 | David Guffey | Powersville, MO 64672 | $5,429 |
58 | Martin M Williams | Unionville, MO 63565 | $5,367 |
59 | Walnut Valley Farms | Unionville, MO 63565 | $5,305 |
60 | Roger And Sharon Pearson Family Revocable Trust | Unionville, MO 63565 | $5,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”