Emergency Conservation Program in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $125,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pickett Family Rev Living Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $1,683 |
22 | Jay Asbury | Perry, MO 63462 | $1,612 |
23 | Epperson Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $1,444 |
24 | Charles Fuqua | New London, MO 63459 | $1,392 |
25 | Nathan A Brown | New London, MO 63459 | $1,336 |
26 | Gerald Flowers | Perry, MO 63462 | $1,284 |
27 | Harold Hamilton | Frankford, MO 63441 | $1,280 |
28 | Richard Gale Wasson Trust | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $1,266 |
29 | Lloyd Ray Shuck Jr | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $1,261 |
30 | Jo Ann Briscoe Rev Living Trust | Columbia, MO 65203 | $1,183 |
31 | Gene Ketsenburg Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $1,159 |
32 | Larry Broocke | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $1,116 |
33 | David Greg Clark | New London, MO 63459 | $1,033 |
34 | Hurley A Brown | New London, MO 63459 | $943 |
35 | Larry Voepel | Center, MO 63436 | $932 |
36 | Griffin Bros Farms LLC | Perry, MO 63462 | $928 |
37 | Stephen Glascock | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $881 |
38 | Edward L Jackson | Frankford, MO 63441 | $863 |
39 | Janice Jackson Cejka | Valparaiso, NE 68065 | $862 |
40 | Daryl Caswell | New London, MO 63459 | $861 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”