Conservation Reserve Program in Ralls County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 359
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $1,532,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steve Steadman | High Ridge, MO 63049 | $10,481 |
42 | Steve English | Columbia, MO 65202 | $10,478 |
43 | Scott Wasson | Center, MO 63436 | $10,351 |
44 | Mike Lake | New London, MO 63459 | $10,341 |
45 | Leeroy Dandridge | Frankford, MO 63441 | $10,315 |
46 | Wanda Sharp | Perry, MO 63462 | $10,249 |
47 | Lyng Acres | New London, MO 63459 | $10,193 |
48 | Mike Dempsey | Washington, MO 63090 | $10,070 |
49 | Virginia Klise Tr Fbo Charles Silvey | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $9,721 |
50 | Russell Edward Alexander | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $9,479 |
51 | Marianna Miller | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $9,476 |
52 | Painter Family Revocable Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $9,286 |
53 | Coelco | Saint Louis, MO 63144 | $8,835 |
54 | Dan Redman | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $8,805 |
55 | John Wilford Briscoe | New London, MO 63459 | $8,769 |
56 | Thomas G Crosby | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $8,535 |
57 | Michael Bozeman | Saint Louis, MO 63114 | $8,506 |
58 | Cross Creek Acres LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $8,442 |
59 | Eleanor W Drake Irrevocable Trust | Lees Summit, MO 64063 | $8,400 |
60 | Virginia Fletcher | New London, MO 63459 | $8,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”