Conservation Reserve Program in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,185
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $44,781,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | The Lippincott Family Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $136,767 |
82 | Donald Dotson | Choctaw, OK 73020 | $135,231 |
83 | Connie Gibbs | New London, MO 63459 | $134,847 |
84 | Hardy Family Rev Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $133,127 |
85 | Rhea Stroud | New London, MO 63459 | $131,167 |
86 | Clarence Bogue | Center, MO 63436 | $130,961 |
87 | Hildebrand Farms | Center, MO 63436 | $130,594 |
88 | Edward L Jackson | Frankford, MO 63441 | $128,992 |
89 | Lealon Smith | Conway, AR 72032 | $127,749 |
90 | Linda K Epperson Family Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $127,649 |
91 | Michael Bozeman | Saint Louis, MO 63114 | $127,583 |
92 | Steve English | Columbia, MO 65202 | $127,541 |
93 | Cross Creek Acres LLC | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $127,198 |
94 | David Poage | Perry, MO 63462 | $126,317 |
95 | M2 Farms LLC | Springboro, OH 45066 | $126,206 |
96 | Tom Dorsey | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $125,186 |
97 | Hays Farms | Palmyra, MO 63461 | $125,075 |
98 | Wayne C Mcdaniel | Columbia, MO 65203 | $124,649 |
99 | E C Stroud | New London, MO 63459 | $120,758 |
100 | Alexander Roy | Eureka, MO 63025 | $119,338 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”