Total Conservation Programs in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,277
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $45,798,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Alexander Roy | Eureka, MO 63025 | $119,338 |
102 | Mike Epperson | New London, MO 63459 | $118,242 |
103 | Lee Britt | New London, MO 63459 | $116,508 |
104 | Dwaine S And Etta Mae Fertch Rev | Center, MO 63436 | $114,577 |
105 | The Philos Group Inc | Troy, MO 63379 | $112,364 |
106 | Lola Patton | New London, MO 63459 | $112,224 |
107 | G H Lomax | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $111,580 |
108 | Scobee Farms LLC | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $109,279 |
109 | James F Ryan | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $108,489 |
110 | Bob Freiling | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $107,056 |
111 | Leota Shoemyer | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $106,894 |
112 | David Evans | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $106,434 |
113 | Michael Potter | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $105,144 |
114 | Paul White | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $104,517 |
115 | John Asbury | Perry, MO 63462 | $104,127 |
116 | Jeremy Lake | New London, MO 63459 | $102,944 |
117 | Daniel Seabaugh | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $102,867 |
118 | Gary Ronald Epperson Family Inc | New London, MO 63459 | $102,649 |
119 | Lehenbauer Livestock & Grain Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $102,176 |
120 | D Elaine Peery | Center, MO 63436 | $101,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”