Total Commodity Programs in Ralls County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 637
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $3,706,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Oglesby Farms LLC | New London, MO 63459 | $9,496 |
102 | Devin Klise | New London, MO 63459 | $9,382 |
103 | Dane Power | Perry, MO 63462 | $9,278 |
104 | Clayton Robinson Farms LLC | Center, MO 63436 | $9,170 |
105 | Michael Evans | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $9,169 |
106 | Parker Kendrick | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $9,097 |
107 | D & S Morris Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $8,653 |
108 | Eddie Gooch | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $8,547 |
109 | Eleanor W Drake Irrevocable Trust | Lees Summit, MO 64063 | $8,373 |
110 | Gerald Raymond Briscoe | New London, MO 63459 | $8,246 |
111 | Epperson Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $8,228 |
112 | Robert Wise | Perry, MO 63462 | $8,210 |
113 | James Albert Robinson | Laddonia, MO 63352 | $8,146 |
114 | Matthew Seward | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $8,128 |
115 | Merrilyn Parham Rev Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $8,105 |
116 | Albert Black | Lees Summit, MO 64064 | $8,019 |
117 | Anne Parham Hizar | New London, MO 63459 | $7,995 |
118 | Brett Reading | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $7,868 |
119 | Chad Reading | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $7,868 |
120 | Philip D Briscoe | New London, MO 63459 | $7,645 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”