Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 142
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $377,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Evelyn Moyers | Pensacola, FL 32507 | $423 |
122 | Harriette King | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $423 |
123 | Thomas H Coomes | Perry, MO 63462 | $423 |
124 | Robert Wise | Perry, MO 63462 | $411 |
125 | David Wise | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $411 |
126 | Evelyn Erb | Springfield, MO 65807 | $387 |
127 | Bonnie L Stewart | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $378 |
128 | Charles Strode | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $370 |
129 | Mark Giessinger | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $284 |
130 | Mark Mclaughlin | New London, MO 63459 | $281 |
131 | Marvin E Lehenbauer | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $271 |
132 | Dinah Epperson Noble | Curryville, MO 63339 | $269 |
133 | Chris Thomas | New London, MO 63459 | $263 |
134 | Tim Flowerree | New London, MO 63459 | $243 |
135 | Albert Boss | New London, MO 63459 | $241 |
136 | Daniel Strode | New London, MO 63459 | $224 |
137 | Robert Byers | New London, MO 63459 | $194 |
138 | Don Griffin | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $185 |
139 | Anthony W Griffin | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $185 |
140 | Donald A Gieseke | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $123 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”