Farm Subsidy information
Ralls County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Ralls County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 911
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $20,509,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Two Mile Pork LLC | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $1,500,000 |
| 2 | Maher Brothers Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $1,111,065 |
| 3 | Epperson Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $923,266 |
| 4 | Jay Asbury | Perry, MO 63462 | $283,056 |
| 5 | Ccr Farms LLC | Laddonia, MO 63352 | $251,590 |
| 6 | David Ketsenburg Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $248,193 |
| 7 | Todd Hays Farms Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $239,687 |
| 8 | Epperson Family Farms | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $233,427 |
| 9 | Lambert Joseph Hagan Jr | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $212,370 |
| 10 | Donald Eugene Evans | Center, MO 63436 | $192,890 |
| 11 | Kathy Sue Shramek | Williamsburg, MO 63388 | $181,840 |
| 12 | G Wayne Beshears | Frankford, MO 63441 | $178,559 |
| 13 | Carman Farms LLC | Center, MO 63436 | $177,057 |
| 14 | Sunset View Farms | Center, MO 63436 | $175,311 |
| 15 | Timothy Lee Eisele | Perry, MO 63462 | $165,020 |
| 16 | Dennis Dale Shramek | Williamsburg, MO 63388 | $162,599 |
| 17 | Gregory Alan Eisele | Perry, MO 63462 | $162,526 |
| 18 | Hodges Brothers LLC | Perry, MO 63462 | $158,334 |
| 19 | Bryan A Evans | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $155,080 |
| 20 | Keil Farms Inc | Perry, MO 63462 | $153,317 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf