Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Ralls County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 368
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Ralls County, Missouri totaled $672,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ferrel Smith Rev Trust | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $2,884 |
62 | James E Cottrell | Center, MO 63436 | $2,858 |
63 | Pickett Family Rev Living Trust | New London, MO 63459 | $2,853 |
64 | Timothy Wayne Kurz | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,815 |
65 | Riechard Family Rev Living Trust | Center, MO 63436 | $2,809 |
66 | Berdette B Cook | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $2,794 |
67 | Epperson Farms Inc | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,792 |
68 | Pennewell Farms | New London, MO 63459 | $2,788 |
69 | Jo Ann Briscoe Rev Living Trust | Columbia, MO 65203 | $2,785 |
70 | Albert L Oglesby | New London, MO 63459 | $2,780 |
71 | James Lemon Jr | New London, MO 63459 | $2,779 |
72 | Lewis E Klise Jr | Center, MO 63436 | $2,757 |
73 | James Arthur Howald | New London, MO 63459 | $2,753 |
74 | B & B Livestock LLC | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,735 |
75 | David Briscoe | New London, MO 63459 | $2,734 |
76 | Franklin Eugene Wallace | Vandalia, MO 63382 | $2,703 |
77 | Nolan T Williams | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $2,665 |
78 | C E Forney | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $2,653 |
79 | Palmer Farm Account | New London, MO 63459 | $2,626 |
80 | R W Drennan | Hannibal, MO 63401 | $2,622 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”