Farm Subsidy information
Randolph County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Randolph County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,608
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Randolph County, Missouri totaled $156,362,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Richard D Keil Trust | Sturgeon, MO 65284 | $201,943 |
142 | William O Cleeton | Moberly, MO 65270 | $198,270 |
143 | Leroy Felten | Fayette, MO 65248 | $196,216 |
144 | The Thane & Michele Thornburg Tru | Rogers, AR 72756 | $196,107 |
145 | Larry W Ferrell | O Fallon, MO 63368 | $193,428 |
146 | Howard E Meyer | Slippery Rock, PA 16057 | $192,733 |
147 | Donna Wemhoff | Columbia, MO 65202 | $192,213 |
148 | Elizabeth L Minner | Bartlett, TN 38135 | $191,357 |
149 | Dan Roling Farms Inc | Armstrong, MO 65230 | $190,414 |
150 | James Clark Wilson | Ripley, TN 38063 | $187,931 |
151 | David Merritt Allen | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $187,861 |
152 | Jason Keith Alexander | Madison, MO 65263 | $187,782 |
153 | John Bowen | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $184,886 |
154 | Ronald Kitchen | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $181,076 |
155 | Frank H Thieman Trust Agreement D | Moberly, MO 65270 | $179,753 |
156 | Eric G Jaecques | Cairo, MO 65239 | $176,769 |
157 | Edwin Miller | Moberly, MO 65270 | $176,412 |
158 | Kevin Sharpe | Moberly, MO 65270 | $176,065 |
159 | James Coots | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $171,137 |
160 | Saale Farms Inc | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $170,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”