Total Conservation Programs in Randolph County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 247
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Randolph County, Missouri totaled $2,150,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Gary R Hamilton | Columbia, MO 65203 | $3,682 |
142 | Donald S Wilmes | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,670 |
143 | David Walter Rasmussen | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $3,657 |
144 | Steve S Hunt | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $3,576 |
145 | Kamler Trust Dated April 10 1998 | Sioux Falls, SD 57104 | $3,489 |
146 | Lynn Gittemeier | Jacksonville, MO 65260 | $3,470 |
147 | Barry G Schaefer | Moberly, MO 65270 | $3,467 |
148 | Leroy Jackson | Moberly, MO 65270 | $3,437 |
149 | Forest Conley | Moberly, MO 65270 | $3,422 |
150 | Arthur J Crutchfield | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $3,416 |
151 | Janet M Hackward | Jacksonville, MO 65260 | $3,406 |
152 | Hsueh-lang Shen | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $3,342 |
153 | Chad & Michel O'donnell Living Trust Dated April 5 | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $3,304 |
154 | Roland E Lohmar | Columbia, MO 65202 | $3,216 |
155 | Gloria G Finley | Olathe, KS 66062 | $3,204 |
156 | Charles Gordon | Salisbury, MO 65281 | $3,146 |
157 | Joel Weston Land | Clifton Hill, MO 65244 | $3,117 |
158 | Kelvin Land | Sunrise Beach, MO 65079 | $3,117 |
159 | Big Cedar Prairie LLC | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $3,098 |
160 | , | $3,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”