Conservation Reserve Program in Randolph County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,209
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Randolph County, Missouri totaled $62,594,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wyatt Farms Enterprises LLC | Callao, MO 63534 | $1,523,703 |
2 | Jimmie A Tregnago And Rosalie Tre | Moberly, MO 65270 | $989,265 |
3 | Stanley Wemhoff | Moberly, MO 65270 | $957,366 |
4 | Don Wemhoff | Columbia, MO 65202 | $874,121 |
5 | Joe Kroner | Moberly, MO 65270 | $836,617 |
6 | David H Downing | Higbee, MO 65257 | $833,155 |
7 | Ray L Richardson | Nampa, ID 83686 | $755,315 |
8 | Ryals Living Trust Dated 4/14/98 | Clifton Hill, MO 65244 | $749,854 |
9 | Shelton Family Partnership Lp | Montgomery City, MO 63361 | $646,002 |
10 | Robert And Shirley Summers Living Tr | Huntsville, MO 65259 | $615,453 |
11 | Kenneth D Wemhoff | Moberly, MO 65270 | $604,782 |
12 | Hoerst Family Trust | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $603,779 |
13 | Cochran Living Trust | Cairo, MO 65239 | $545,475 |
14 | Merl Wemhoff | Clark, MO 65243 | $529,103 |
15 | Jack Franklin | Moberly, MO 65270 | $512,332 |
16 | J Webster Farms Inc | Clifton Hill, MO 65244 | $510,550 |
17 | Mike Wilson | West Monroe, LA 71294 | $500,550 |
18 | Byron Dejonge | Higbee, MO 65257 | $495,495 |
19 | Vincent J Wemhoff | Moberly, MO 65270 | $469,604 |
20 | Wyatt Farms Inc | Callao, MO 63534 | $452,351 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>