Total Commodity Programs in Ripley County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 746
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ripley County, Missouri totaled $31,942,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Imogene Spargo Trust | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $160,315 |
42 | Clarence O Sullivan Revocable Tru | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $158,258 |
43 | Garry E Lassiter | Naylor, MO 63953 | $154,487 |
44 | Douglas Woodard Estate | Naylor, MO 63953 | $151,359 |
45 | Red Sea Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $136,805 |
46 | Jill Lynxwiler | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $135,828 |
47 | Dennis Robison Farms LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $126,945 |
48 | Woolard Brothers Farms LLC | Naylor, MO 63953 | $126,205 |
49 | Teribeth Spargo | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $115,638 |
50 | Kelly Pippin | Naylor, MO 63953 | $113,307 |
51 | Mitchell Hribovsek | Naylor, MO 63953 | $112,885 |
52 | Bobby A Huey | Newport, AR 72112 | $112,663 |
53 | Jett Brothers Planting Company Gp | Success, AR 72470 | $112,619 |
54 | Teribeth Anette Spargo | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $111,860 |
55 | Thomas Howard Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $107,310 |
56 | Edl Farms | Corning, AR 72422 | $106,754 |
57 | Lori Annette Turner | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $104,131 |
58 | Mark B & Velma L Bryles Trust | Blytheville, AR 72315 | $102,348 |
59 | Clyde Turner | Naylor, MO 63953 | $101,387 |
60 | Herbert Hartwig Trust | Success, AR 72470 | $99,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”