Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 182
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $230,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robert Hallemeier | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $792 |
42 | Joseph A Brass | Alton, IL 62002 | $769 |
43 | Becker Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $764 |
44 | Ralph Mintert | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $761 |
45 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $696 |
46 | Jerome & Ronald Schulte | West Alton, MO 63386 | $655 |
47 | Clarence A Steinhoff Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $655 |
48 | Fred E Willbrand Rev Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $651 |
49 | D & D Wappelhorst Farm, LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $636 |
50 | Ray Mossman | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $595 |
51 | Steinhoff Brothers | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $593 |
52 | Josephine Dwiggins | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $568 |
53 | Muriel Realty Company | Saint Louis, MO 63130 | $552 |
54 | Meredith Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $538 |
55 | John T Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $533 |
56 | Samuel Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $531 |
57 | Francis L Weber | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $523 |
58 | Roy E Weber | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $512 |
59 | Herbert R Iffrig | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $504 |
60 | Mabel Ridder | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $494 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”