Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82

Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $1,272,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE)
1995-2023
41A S E Farms LLCWest Alton, MO 63386$3,345
42Charles Barnard WeberSaint Charles, MO 63301$3,180
43Kamphoefner Farms LpDefiance, MO 63341$3,129
44Lawrence Sommer TrustSaint Paul, MO 63366$2,615
45Clementine E Sommer TrustSaint Paul, MO 63366$2,601
46Wallace H Keeteman Rev TrustOld Monroe, MO 63369$2,519
47Marie Schulte Rev TrustSaint Paul, MO 63366$2,246
48Leogene WeberO Fallon, MO 63366$2,246
49Elizabeth L Dyer Revocable TrustO Fallon, MO 63366$2,054
50Clement WeberSaint Charles, MO 63301$2,027
51Fuest Family TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,952
52Barwise Farm LLCSaint Peters, MO 63376$1,879
53Heitmann Family TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,779
54Heitmann Family TrustSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,770
55Sally E MitchellCottage Hills, IL 62018$1,747
56Merz Family TrustOrange, CA 92867$1,746
57Patricia WalkerSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,734
58Gloria PoeseSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,734
59Elsie E SchroederWentzville, MO 63385$1,447
60Evangeline M MeyerSaint Charles, MO 63301$1,393

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag