Farm Subsidy information
Saint Charles County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $5,511,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | A S E Farms LLC | West Alton, MO 63386 | $4,528 |
62 | Larry D Kohler | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $4,490 |
63 | Weslynd P Willbrand | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $4,133 |
64 | Backwater Farms LLC | Bridgeton, MO 63044 | $4,070 |
65 | Nicholas Lawrence Dyer | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $3,926 |
66 | Gerald Lee Schulte | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,704 |
67 | Robert Burk | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,650 |
68 | Walter Tochtrop | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $3,425 |
69 | Sharon K Vogelgesang | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $3,378 |
70 | Ruff Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,365 |
71 | Semke Farming LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,315 |
72 | Anthony Steinmann | Moscow Mills, MO 63362 | $3,215 |
73 | Willbrand Grain Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,155 |
74 | Danny Ray Hackmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $3,121 |
75 | Roland Wehmeier Jr | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,087 |
76 | Kyle R Weigel | Brussels, IL 62013 | $2,749 |
77 | D & D St Peters LLC | Louisiana, MO 63353 | $2,645 |
78 | Mid-river Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $2,548 |
79 | Dunkmann Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $2,535 |
80 | Andrew Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $2,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”