Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 112
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $63,714 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Charles Daudt Marital Trust | Old Saybrook, CT 06475 | $88 |
82 | Elaine Jaspering Revoc Living Trust | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $83 |
83 | Patricia Freymuth | Foristell, MO 63348 | $82 |
84 | Linda King | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $75 |
85 | Judy Ann Preli | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $73 |
86 | Carol S Johnson | St Charles, MO 63301 | $73 |
87 | Trent Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $72 |
88 | Ellen Weber Family Partnership Lp | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $66 |
89 | Jean Phillion | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $60 |
90 | Marcelina Stratman | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $59 |
91 | Linda Meyer | Saint Louis, MO 63122 | $58 |
92 | Jeanette T Maschmidt Revocable Living Trust | Elsberry, MO 63343 | $45 |
93 | Pfeiffer Fam Farm LLC | Weldon Spring, MO 63304 | $42 |
94 | Joerling Properties LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $39 |
95 | Audrey Conoyer | St Peters, MO 63376 | $38 |
96 | Marcia Conoyer | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $36 |
97 | Susan Eastman | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $36 |
98 | Nancy Hollaway | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $36 |
99 | , | $36 | |
100 | Lee Ann Difani Revocable Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $31 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”