Farm Subsidy information
Saint Charles County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $5,511,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mary Jente | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $2,396 |
82 | R&b Feise Farms LLC | Ofallon, MO 63366 | $2,376 |
83 | Roger Sudbrock | Foristell, MO 63348 | $2,201 |
84 | Leonard Sudbrock | Foristell, MO 63348 | $2,201 |
85 | River View Farms Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $2,095 |
86 | Robert L Vogt | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $2,074 |
87 | Bryan Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $2,024 |
88 | Kahuna Land Co | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $1,915 |
89 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $1,910 |
90 | Mark O Schulte | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $1,854 |
91 | Theodore J Freiburger Living Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $1,825 |
92 | Jl Farms LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $1,811 |
93 | Echo Ridge Farm Inc | Augusta, MO 63332 | $1,772 |
94 | Dennis Weber | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $1,732 |
95 | Frances Westhoff Trust | Columbia, MO 65201 | $1,719 |
96 | Steinhoff Grain Farm LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $1,709 |
97 | Machens Bros LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $1,693 |
98 | David Machens | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $1,687 |
99 | Michael S Mintert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $1,631 |
100 | Dale Schaper | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $1,561 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”