Direct Payment Program in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,635
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $19,577,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Timothy Hughes | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $59,155 |
82 | Mennemeier Farm | West Alton, MO 63386 | $58,450 |
83 | Claude A Boschert | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $57,907 |
84 | Pleasant Union Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $57,612 |
85 | Machens Bros LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $57,137 |
86 | Wilmes Brothers | Foristell, MO 63348 | $56,744 |
87 | Nicholas Prouhet | Lake St Louis, MO 63367 | $56,214 |
88 | Charles Bethmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $55,042 |
89 | Michael Farley Rev Trust | Florissant, MO 63034 | $54,497 |
90 | David Farley | West Alton, MO 63386 | $54,497 |
91 | Brian Lee Ostmann | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $53,413 |
92 | David Tochtrop | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $52,650 |
93 | C And C Farms | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $51,741 |
94 | Sch-farm | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $51,655 |
95 | Robert Kipp | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $51,425 |
96 | Von Semke | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $50,897 |
97 | Gerald Lee Schulte | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $50,883 |
98 | Thomas E Weber | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $50,731 |
99 | Herbert Boerding | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $50,030 |
100 | William Wehmeier Revocable Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $49,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”