Farm Subsidy information
Saint Charles County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,754
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $161,199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Saale Family Lp | West Alton, MO 63386 | $232,229 |
102 | Schnarre Brothers Farm LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $229,215 |
103 | Charles Bethmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $227,299 |
104 | Eugene Beckham | West Alton, MO 63386 | $227,065 |
105 | Fienup Inv Co | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $226,843 |
106 | Thomas E Weber | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $220,859 |
107 | Precision Farms LLC | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $220,822 |
108 | D & E Grain Farms LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $219,987 |
109 | Clarence A Steinhoff Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $218,257 |
110 | Jerome George Huber Living Trust | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $216,069 |
111 | Robert Kipp | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $214,441 |
112 | Wiesehan Grain Farms, LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $214,236 |
113 | Bernard L Mintert Revocable Trust | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $212,206 |
114 | Machens Bros LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $210,676 |
115 | David Farley | West Alton, MO 63386 | $208,256 |
116 | Walter & Jean Voelkerding Char Tr | Dutzow, MO 63342 | $203,688 |
117 | Marshall Buder | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $202,316 |
118 | Cuivre Farms Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $202,132 |
119 | Wiedey Family Farm Ptr | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $201,675 |
120 | Doug Ruff | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $201,534 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”