Farm Subsidy information
Saint Charles County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 163
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $5,511,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Earthdance | Saint Louis, MO 63135 | $981 |
122 | , | $930 | |
123 | Ostmann Family Farm Lp | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $905 |
124 | Family Trust U/w Of Warren Ostmann | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $900 |
125 | Darlene Dwiggins | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $881 |
126 | Casper Brass Farm LLC | West Alton, MO 63386 | $822 |
127 | Frederick H Lang | Williamsburg, MO 63388 | $813 |
128 | Mallard Point LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $759 |
129 | Trent Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $734 |
130 | Harold Stephens | West Alton, MO 63386 | $720 |
131 | F And G Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $665 |
132 | Altene Muich Revocable Trust | Greensboro, NC 27438 | $656 |
133 | Boerding Farm LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $647 |
134 | Machens Aloysius A Residual Tr | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $616 |
135 | Seigler Farm | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $596 |
136 | Dennis H Wappelhorst Rev Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $562 |
137 | Wayne Borgschulte | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $543 |
138 | Curtis C Rosenbohm | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $540 |
139 | Lawrence Schroeder | Florissant, MO 63034 | $503 |
140 | John Wortmann | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”