Total Disaster Programs in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 143
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $448,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Terry D Hackmann | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $184 |
122 | Vrm Family Lp | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $172 |
123 | Ray & Gary Machens Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $160 |
124 | Richard C Simon | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $155 |
125 | John Dunkmann | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $148 |
126 | Charles Burt | De Soto, MO 63020 | $139 |
127 | Carol S Finck Gst Exempt Trust U/a Edward F Huncke | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $138 |
128 | Anita Gray | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $121 |
129 | Robert Henry Fuerhoff Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $121 |
130 | Violet Lee Neustadt Trust | Florissant, MO 63034 | $120 |
131 | Vernon T Tipp | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $114 |
132 | Loretta Loeffler | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $112 |
133 | Stahlschmidt Family Trust | Alton, IL 62002 | $110 |
134 | Janet Lavern Simon Revocable Inter Vivos Trust | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $105 |
135 | Margaret Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $92 |
136 | Gerald & Rose Kluesner Inc | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $61 |
137 | Ray Meyer | Springfield, MO 65810 | $61 |
138 | Linda Meyer | Saint Louis, MO 63122 | $60 |
139 | Mary Ann Ell | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $36 |
140 | Susan Eastman | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $36 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”