Total Commodity Programs in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 2,668
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $90,081,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Cella Pres Charles J | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $138,548 |
142 | St Albans Properties LLC | Saint Albans, MO 63073 | $137,866 |
143 | B Michael Mcmenamy | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $136,428 |
144 | Roesner Brothers Farms LLC | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $136,374 |
145 | Sch-farm | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $134,142 |
146 | Ruff II Limited Partnership | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $133,949 |
147 | Daryl Dove | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $131,558 |
148 | Joseph Dennis Weber | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $131,249 |
149 | Larry Schwoeppe | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $130,950 |
150 | Leroy Dickherber Trust D/b/a Lcd Farms LLC | O Fallon, MO 63367 | $130,810 |
151 | Linda Love Living Trust | College Station, TX 77845 | $129,397 |
152 | Neal And Linda Schnarre Liv Trust | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $129,056 |
153 | Wilmes Brothers | Foristell, MO 63348 | $127,911 |
154 | Simon Brothers LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $126,529 |
155 | Matthew Neustadt | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $124,239 |
156 | Timothy Lee Meyers | West Alton, MO 63386 | $124,045 |
157 | M & H Grain Farms Inc | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $123,224 |
158 | William Wehmeier Revocable Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $122,190 |
159 | Kenneth J Montgomery | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $121,726 |
160 | S & D Westerfeld Farms LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $120,790 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”