Loan Deficiency in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,444
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $17,539,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $92,622 |
42 | Pfa Associates L P | Clayton, MO 63105 | $92,343 |
43 | Paul H Schumpe | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $84,485 |
44 | Larry D Kohler | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $83,091 |
45 | Bernard J Mcmenamy | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $82,313 |
46 | Wortmann Bros | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $81,089 |
47 | Fienup Inv Co | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $80,287 |
48 | Robert Feise | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $79,455 |
49 | Richard C Simon | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $79,060 |
50 | Thomas E Weber | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $77,298 |
51 | John C Bethmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $77,274 |
52 | Danny Ray Hackmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $76,447 |
53 | Charles A Mintert | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $76,081 |
54 | Terry D Hackmann | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $76,070 |
55 | Ronald Lee Hackmann | Saint Charles, MO 63304 | $76,066 |
56 | Don Mallinckrodt | Augusta, MO 63332 | $75,517 |
57 | Bernard L Mintert Revocable Trust | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $73,142 |
58 | Clarence A Steinhoff Trust | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $72,103 |
59 | Bluff View Farms Inc | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $71,292 |
60 | Charles Bethmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $71,034 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”