Total Commodity Programs in Saint Charles County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 698
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Charles County, Missouri totaled $2,566,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Quail Point Development Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $16,576 |
42 | Bryan Boschert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $16,545 |
43 | Howell Agri Inc | Defiance, MO 63341 | $16,473 |
44 | Dyer Inc | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $16,414 |
45 | Bonhomme Farms LLC | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $16,352 |
46 | Nicholas Lawrence Dyer | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $15,862 |
47 | Cletus Kampmann Jr | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $15,861 |
48 | Melvin Neustadt Jr | West Alton, MO 63386 | $15,845 |
49 | Farley Point Farms Inc | West Alton, MO 63386 | $15,673 |
50 | Steinhoff Bros Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $14,865 |
51 | Semke Farming LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $14,533 |
52 | Daryl Dove | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $14,281 |
53 | Roesner Brothers Farms LLC | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $14,278 |
54 | Mgse LLC | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $14,150 |
55 | Wilmes Bros Farm LLC | Foristell, MO 63348 | $13,933 |
56 | A.g.a. Farms, LLC | Portage Des Sioux, MO 63373 | $13,883 |
57 | Michael S Mintert | West Alton, MO 63386 | $13,855 |
58 | Roger Steinmann Farm, LLC | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $13,835 |
59 | Gregory William Wehmeyer | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $13,719 |
60 | Danny Ray Hackmann | Saint Peters, MO 63376 | $13,110 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”