Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Clair County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 495
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Clair County, Missouri totaled $722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dean Mcmillin | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $4,337 |
42 | Mary Ann Crowder | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,314 |
43 | Howard Mount | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,313 |
44 | Jerry L Fennewald | Rockville, MO 64780 | $4,101 |
45 | Matt Alexander | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $4,082 |
46 | Rodabaugh Farms | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $3,981 |
47 | Dave Lynn Freeman | Collins, MO 64738 | $3,902 |
48 | Bill Gilkey | Clinton, MO 64735 | $3,864 |
49 | Michael Edward Mallicoat | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $3,762 |
50 | Harold E Loman | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $3,758 |
51 | Chris Thompson | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,724 |
52 | John Lysinger Jr | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $3,682 |
53 | Knight Family Revocable Trust Dated May 19, 2010 | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,642 |
54 | Kenneth Knight | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,436 |
55 | Michael Gurley | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $3,406 |
56 | Dennis Bock | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,366 |
57 | Dale Bock | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,363 |
58 | Virgie Francis Living Trust | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $3,352 |
59 | Larry Bracher | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,226 |
60 | Gary Waggoner | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $3,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”