Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Clair County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 495
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Clair County, Missouri totaled $722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dale Roeder | Osceola, MO 64776 | $3,218 |
62 | Aloise Inskeep | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,197 |
63 | Jim Hutchison | Schell City, MO 64783 | $3,177 |
64 | Wright Farms Irrev Trust | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $3,130 |
65 | Heiman Farms LLC | Butler, MO 64730 | $2,812 |
66 | Charles L Peery | Osceola, MO 64776 | $2,774 |
67 | Mark Brownlee | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $2,773 |
68 | Craig Johnson | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,732 |
69 | Darrel M Cordrey | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,730 |
70 | Alan C Haverland | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $2,682 |
71 | David Knight | Montrose, MO 64770 | $2,653 |
72 | Nelson Stoddard | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,649 |
73 | Gary Edwin Munsterman | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,649 |
74 | Daniel Siegismund | Rockville, MO 64780 | $2,592 |
75 | Edward B Strope Trust | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $2,559 |
76 | Dale And Charmayne Munsterman Trust | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,553 |
77 | Donald Martin | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,529 |
78 | Anita Darlene Hearting | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $2,527 |
79 | Brad Scott | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $2,519 |
80 | Gale Osborn | Osceola, MO 64776 | $2,488 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”