Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Clair County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 495
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Clair County, Missouri totaled $722,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Hawkins Farms | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,962 |
102 | James Huffman J D Baker Trustee | Osceola, MO 64776 | $1,912 |
103 | Mike R Schooley | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,879 |
104 | James E Smith | Clinton, MO 64735 | $1,856 |
105 | Terry Strope | Deepwater, MO 64740 | $1,851 |
106 | Larry Dean Walters | Lowry City, MO 64763 | $1,805 |
107 | David Barger | Rockville, MO 64780 | $1,788 |
108 | Albert Wright | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,765 |
109 | Jean Peterman | Springfield, MO 65809 | $1,707 |
110 | Kurt Davis | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,706 |
111 | Elbert L Green | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,678 |
112 | Norma Davis | Raytown, MO 64133 | $1,667 |
113 | Russell James | Osceola, MO 64776 | $1,607 |
114 | Garver Farms | Humansville, MO 65674 | $1,604 |
115 | Kenneth L Nance | Collins, MO 64738 | $1,596 |
116 | Teri L Mallicoat Inter Vivos Trust | Osceola, MO 64776 | $1,574 |
117 | David Chapman | Collins, MO 64738 | $1,550 |
118 | Tom Chapman | Osceola, MO 64776 | $1,550 |
119 | Justin & Vickie Branson Rev Tst | Humansville, MO 65674 | $1,533 |
120 | Donald Heiserman | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $1,502 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”