Total Commodity Programs in Saint Clair County, Missouri, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 492
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Clair County, Missouri totaled $2,499,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Matthew Harrison Knight | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $6,631 |
102 | Robert Scott Brownsberger | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $6,502 |
103 | Daniel Siegismund | Rockville, MO 64780 | $6,460 |
104 | Bettie L Bolander Trust Dated February 12 2013 | Osceola, MO 64776 | $6,293 |
105 | Chris Heiserman | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $6,263 |
106 | John Jurgensmeyer | Osceola, MO 64776 | $6,195 |
107 | Duwayne Rapp | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,946 |
108 | Ethan Allen Bracher | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,829 |
109 | A & E Nogal | Warrenville, IL 60555 | $5,715 |
110 | Victor Hunter Cloud | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,626 |
111 | Jason L Smith | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,618 |
112 | Craig L Roberts | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,602 |
113 | James Lynn Mcewan | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,524 |
114 | Craig W Johnson | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $5,404 |
115 | D Dains Farms LLC | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,386 |
116 | John F Meloy Trust | Osceola, MO 64776 | $5,351 |
117 | Tadd Barnett | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $5,193 |
118 | Debbie Wright | Appleton City, MO 64724 | $5,115 |
119 | Linda Kennedy | Rockville, MO 64780 | $5,036 |
120 | Harms Land Management LLC | Peculiar, MO 64078 | $5,027 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”