Total Disaster Programs in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 111
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $1,788,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James Burtelow | Ballwin, MO 63022 | $8,324 |
42 | John R Timmermann | Saint Louis, MO 63128 | $8,137 |
43 | John Pellet Estate | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $7,178 |
44 | Thomas R Mckeever | Pacific, MO 63069 | $6,628 |
45 | Joseph Rademacher Jr | Pacific, MO 63069 | $6,609 |
46 | J & D Walter | Saint Louis, MO 63129 | $6,162 |
47 | Troy H Wolfe | High Ridge, MO 63049 | $6,060 |
48 | John Wm Musterman | Troy, MO 63379 | $5,841 |
49 | Wilbur Beckemeier | Saint Louis, MO 63146 | $5,635 |
50 | L W Reuther & Sons | Eolia, MO 63344 | $5,524 |
51 | James F Mathis | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $5,030 |
52 | Joseph L Prouhet Rev Trust | Wentzville, MO 63385 | $4,895 |
53 | Marshall Beckman | Alton, IL 62002 | $4,832 |
54 | City Of St Louis | Saint Louis, MO 63103 | $3,999 |
55 | Coleman Family Ltd Partnership | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $3,540 |
56 | Velma Vasquez | Saint Louis, MO 63134 | $3,212 |
57 | John W Schroeter | Saint Louis, MO 63128 | $3,206 |
58 | Thies Farm & Greenhouses | Saint Louis, MO 63121 | $3,016 |
59 | J F Grahlherr | Texico, IL 62889 | $3,005 |
60 | Hugo Essen Farms Inc | Saint Louis, MO 63141 | $2,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”