Loan Deficiency in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 175
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $2,558,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David Koester | Florissant, MO 63031 | $2,594 |
82 | Jason Farley | West Alton, MO 63386 | $2,562 |
83 | Roy W Fischer Jr | Saint Louis, MO 63105 | $2,549 |
84 | Dennis Schneider | Florissant, MO 63034 | $2,375 |
85 | Gil Schroeder Sod Sales Inc | House Springs, MO 63051 | $2,361 |
86 | Adrian Koch | , 00000 | $2,355 |
87 | Trust For Lori Willbrand | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $2,142 |
88 | Cordell Queathem | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $2,030 |
89 | Lillie Devine | Pacific, MO 63069 | $2,001 |
90 | Fern Ridge Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63144 | $1,957 |
91 | Olive Koch L P | Nashville, IL 62263 | $1,901 |
92 | Adrian Koch L P | Nashville, IL 62263 | $1,901 |
93 | Estate Of Lillie Devine | Pacific, MO 63069 | $1,849 |
94 | Zierenberg Farms LLC | Maryland Heights, MO 63043 | $1,824 |
95 | Thomas Peter Wittmann | Dallas, TX 75229 | $1,806 |
96 | Dennis Gierhart | Chesterfield, MO 63005 | $1,752 |
97 | John & Helen Pund Revocable Trust | O Fallon, MO 63366 | $1,556 |
98 | Muriel Realty Company | Saint Louis, MO 63130 | $1,529 |
99 | Lon K Reising | Salem, MO 65560 | $1,490 |
100 | Dolores L Reising | Salem, MO 65560 | $1,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”