Loan Deficiency in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 175
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $2,558,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Lorraine Wieters | Lake Saint Louis, MO 63367 | $960 |
122 | Lane Dierberg | New Haven, MO 63068 | $924 |
123 | Bill's Rent-all Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63303 | $863 |
124 | Alfred Hoelscher Estate | San Jose, CA 95120 | $855 |
125 | John K Pellet Trust | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $790 |
126 | Rose Becherer | Saint Louis, MO 63138 | $779 |
127 | John C Musterman | Warrenton, MO 63383 | $763 |
128 | Charles Baer | Saint Louis, MO 63124 | $758 |
129 | Robert Horneker | Troy, IL 62294 | $749 |
130 | Buccaneer Property Managers Inc | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $726 |
131 | City Of Eureka | Eureka, MO 63025 | $725 |
132 | Al Stix | Saint Louis, MO 63146 | $695 |
133 | John Cournoyer | Maryland Heights, MO 63043 | $695 |
134 | Nancy Pellet Matson | Estes Park, CO 80517 | $670 |
135 | Mel Storch | Lake Saint Louis, MO 63367 | $670 |
136 | Ethel Rombach | Ballwin, MO 63011 | $667 |
137 | Kenneth Kleiman | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $660 |
138 | Shirley M Dodson | Valley Park, MO 63088 | $660 |
139 | Walter Stemme | Marthasville, MO 63357 | $648 |
140 | Windsor Crossing Community Church | Chesterfield, MO 63006 | $608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”