Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Louis County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 108
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Louis County, Missouri totaled $305,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mid-river Farms Inc | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $4,005 |
22 | David Henry Beckman | Saint Charles, MO 63301 | $3,238 |
23 | Robert E Kilbreath | Pacific, MO 63069 | $3,236 |
24 | Moore Quality Farms | Kansas City, MO 64121 | $2,995 |
25 | Lynn E Meyer | Florissant, MO 63034 | $2,940 |
26 | Roger August Schroeder | Hazelwood, MO 63042 | $2,905 |
27 | Marie R Burkhardt | Chesterfield, MO 63017 | $2,579 |
28 | J F Grahlherr | Texico, IL 62889 | $2,573 |
29 | Wilbur Beckemeier | Saint Louis, MO 63146 | $2,557 |
30 | Five-j Family Limited Partnership | Kimberling Cy, MO 65686 | $2,316 |
31 | City Of St Louis | Saint Louis, MO 63103 | $2,307 |
32 | Trautman Farms Inc | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $2,002 |
33 | Shirley Hillemann | Overland Park, KS 66223 | $1,509 |
34 | Gerald L Blackburn | Memphis, TN 38117 | $1,509 |
35 | R & G Investment Co | Saint Louis, MO 63118 | $1,456 |
36 | Don Koester | Florissant, MO 63033 | $1,432 |
37 | Velma Vasquez | Saint Louis, MO 63134 | $1,368 |
38 | Creve Coeur Airpt Improvement Cor | Saint Louis, MO 63146 | $1,282 |
39 | Southwest Farms | Ballwin, MO 63011 | $984 |
40 | Fern Ridge Trust | Saint Louis, MO 63144 | $918 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”