Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $296,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel S Maher | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $3,500 |
22 | Lawrence Burton Holland | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
23 | Roy David Hemme | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $3,500 |
24 | Robert L Thurman | Slater, MO 65349 | $3,500 |
25 | Larry Desmond | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
26 | Marion L Stone | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
27 | E Benedick Samson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
28 | Joyce A Jett | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
29 | Dorothy Gray | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
30 | Walker C Fletcher Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
31 | Edith C Keller | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
32 | Kenneth Wayne Wise | Miami, MO 65344 | $3,500 |
33 | Shannon B Smith Trust Dtd 01/07/1 | Slater, MO 65349 | $3,500 |
34 | Mary B Heying | Miami, MO 65344 | $3,500 |
35 | C R Clough | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,500 |
36 | Mary Catherine Garnett Rev Trust | Thompson, MO 65285 | $3,473 |
37 | Larry E King | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,280 |
38 | William Roger Kurtz | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $3,235 |
39 | Wayne Farr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,226 |
40 | Mark Solomon | Marshall, MO 65340 | $3,193 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”