Farm Subsidy information
Saline County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Saline County, Missouri, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 475
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $12,584,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brandt Fitzgerald | Napton, MO 65340 | $42,883 |
22 | Ryan Lee Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $42,857 |
23 | Anthony Dean Blumhorst | Nelson, MO 65347 | $42,706 |
24 | Jeffrey B Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $41,523 |
25 | 4e LLC | Concordia, MO 64020 | $40,682 |
26 | Gessling Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $38,125 |
27 | John C Vogelsmeier | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $37,259 |
28 | Wayne Brown Ent Inc | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $35,630 |
29 | Edward D Yeagle Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $35,307 |
30 | Stacy R Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $31,658 |
31 | Steven T Ragan | Nelson, MO 65347 | $31,222 |
32 | Matthew David Kueker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $29,540 |
33 | Ckh Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $28,174 |
34 | Evan C Summers | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $27,879 |
35 | Vincent J Livsey Jr | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $27,775 |
36 | Alan Rayl | Houstonia, MO 65333 | $26,985 |
37 | , | $22,144 | |
38 | Lea Anne Evans Revocable Trust | Marshall, MO 65340 | $21,909 |
39 | Tim Thorp | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $21,716 |
40 | Garry Durham | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $20,901 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”