Total Disaster Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,605
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $20,382,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mull Farms, Incorporated | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $125,098 |
22 | Steven J Brandt | Concordia, MO 64020 | $118,605 |
23 | Christopher Neil Jones | Marshall, MO 65340 | $117,705 |
24 | Drew Jackson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $115,939 |
25 | Gessling Farms LLC | Marshall, MO 65340 | $115,821 |
26 | Marshall And Fenner | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $113,466 |
27 | Mendell Lee Elson | Miami, MO 65344 | $110,854 |
28 | Ginger G Mcgraw | Marshall, MO 65340 | $107,697 |
29 | John Paul Mcgraw | Marshall, MO 65340 | $107,093 |
30 | Borgman Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $99,416 |
31 | Larry P Harvey | Nelson, MO 65347 | $95,023 |
32 | Timothy Edward Barringhaus | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $94,090 |
33 | Kevin Joseph Barringhaus | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $94,090 |
34 | Steven Todd Shrader | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $93,261 |
35 | George Daniel Weber | Marshall, MO 65340 | $92,826 |
36 | Lawrence Burton Holland | Marshall, MO 65340 | $92,778 |
37 | S & V Farms LLC | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $92,657 |
38 | Jeff L Smith | Marshall, MO 65340 | $92,394 |
39 | Wildcat Family Farms Re, LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $90,778 |
40 | Ham Hill Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $90,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”