Total Disaster Programs in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,605
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $20,382,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harry James Backes | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $89,850 |
42 | Edward D Yeagle Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $89,734 |
43 | Jeffrey B Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $89,469 |
44 | Melissa G Neff | Marshall, MO 65340 | $88,454 |
45 | Mary C Kemper | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $88,034 |
46 | Matthew David Kueker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $85,385 |
47 | William Roger Kurtz | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $84,587 |
48 | Edward L Dysart | Marshall, MO 65340 | $80,893 |
49 | Garry Durham | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $79,823 |
50 | Larry Charles Scott | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $79,300 |
51 | Bart Vesser | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $78,464 |
52 | Kipping Farms | Carrollton, MO 64633 | $77,406 |
53 | Seth Tyre | Slater, MO 65349 | $77,201 |
54 | Ryan Lee Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $76,684 |
55 | Everett William Rehkop | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $74,145 |
56 | Wendell Waller | Nelson, MO 65347 | $71,049 |
57 | Frank Searcy Mccracken Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $69,795 |
58 | Scott D Pfizenmaier | Marshall, MO 65340 | $69,404 |
59 | Ms Strodtman Operating Co LLC | Glasgow, MO 65254 | $68,985 |
60 | Brandt Fitzgerald | Napton, MO 65340 | $68,702 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”