Market Gains in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 242
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $3,511,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeffery Mckenna Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $22,516 |
42 | Harold Mckenna Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $22,434 |
43 | Harold Mitch Thompson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $22,432 |
44 | Harry William Leimkuehler Jr | Marshall, MO 65340 | $21,804 |
45 | James Dale Malan | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $21,389 |
46 | Curtis Roth Farms LLC | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $20,964 |
47 | Vernon Conrad | Marshall, MO 65340 | $19,375 |
48 | Donald Frederick Malter | Marshall, MO 65340 | $19,268 |
49 | Hidden Hollow Farms LLC | Nelson, MO 65347 | $18,953 |
50 | Dennis Gessling | Slater, MO 65349 | $16,164 |
51 | Loges Farms Inc | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $15,994 |
52 | Dennis Zimmerschied | Blackburn, MO 65321 | $15,978 |
53 | Ryan Lee Sims | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $15,695 |
54 | Laverne Viets | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $15,372 |
55 | Sullivan & Boston | Slater, MO 65349 | $15,137 |
56 | Gary Lee Riley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $14,938 |
57 | Larry D Pointer | Miami, MO 65344 | $14,913 |
58 | Frederick Long Malter | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $14,699 |
59 | Lester Henry Bailey | Marshall, MO 65340 | $14,244 |
60 | Leroy Melies | Sweet Springs, MO 65351 | $13,728 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”