Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Saline County, Missouri, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,069
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Saline County, Missouri totaled $6,869,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Shannon Neal Dowell | Miami, MO 65344 | $35,557 |
42 | John Lester Weinreich | Marshall, MO 65340 | $35,410 |
43 | Ham Hill Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $35,238 |
44 | Jerome Boedeker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $34,654 |
45 | Garold Lawrence Drake II | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $33,799 |
46 | Kurtis Nathaniel Gregory | Marshall, MO 65340 | $33,495 |
47 | Preston N Hisle | Miami, MO 65344 | $31,773 |
48 | Hinnah Farms LLC | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $31,760 |
49 | Gary Waller | Nelson, MO 65347 | $31,735 |
50 | Clough Farms LLC | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $31,553 |
51 | Matthew David Kueker | Marshall, MO 65340 | $31,054 |
52 | Curtis Roth Farms LLC | Blackwater, MO 65322 | $30,730 |
53 | Louis A Eddy | Slater, MO 65349 | $30,432 |
54 | Missouri Crop Management Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $30,047 |
55 | Mike A Venable | Slater, MO 65349 | $29,987 |
56 | Mull Farms, Incorporated | Malta Bend, MO 65339 | $29,845 |
57 | Clayton Deis | Gilliam, MO 65330 | $28,879 |
58 | Leland Randolph Jennings | Miami, MO 65344 | $28,191 |
59 | Monte Van Robertson | Marshall, MO 65340 | $26,447 |
60 | Dean Phegley | Marshall, MO 65340 | $25,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”